the consensus, the hive-like nature of their program framework and so on) in the context of a character-specific article. More of a consideration than anything, but the first two paras of that section strike me as somewhat too generous with the broad details about the geth as a whole (i.e.To clarify what "lore" means, a wikilink would help.These points are now sourced appropriately within the body of the article. With regards to the exact chapter and verse of the Bible, I have replaced the source in ref 27 with the page for a BioWare-endorsed product, which does contain a direct in-game quote from the character uttered in response to EDI's in-game dialogue. The "1,183" numerical value is referenced in the itbusiness.ca source. Therefore, it may be worth modifying at least the first of the mentioned passages to preclude credibility concerns. I can see that the second phrase may be connected to a sentence in the article's Appearances section, but it's quite the leap of logic. 1,183 networked artificial intelligence entities known as the geth" and "The philosophical basis EDI relies on is the Gospel of Mark 5:9" are not supported by any of the cited sources in the article. That said, I suggest that some reservations have to be taken care of in order for this article to really reach an impressive state. Overall, this article looks to be in a pretty decent shape, and the prose in particular is solid. Haleth ( talk) 12:50, 6 August 2021 (UTC) Review Electroguv ( talk) 08:51, 6 August 2021 (UTC) +1 I'm Creator-Haleth, and this is my favorite review comment on Wikipedia. Creator-Haleth should expect impending commentary. This one has assumed direct control of the review.